Category: Hot Topics

  • Announcing Fordham University’s 33rd President, Tania Tetlow, J.D.

    Announcing Fordham University’s 33rd President, Tania Tetlow, J.D.

    Dear Members of the Extended Fordham Community,

    On behalf of the Board of Trustees, I am delighted to announce that we met this morning and unanimously elected Tania Tetlow, J.D., the 33rd President of Fordham University. President-Elect Tetlow will be the first layperson and the first woman to occupy the post in Fordham’s 181-year history. She will take office on July 1, 2022.

    President-Elect Tetlow comes to Fordham from Loyola University New Orleans, where she has served as president since August 2018. She received her Juris Doctor degree from Harvard Law School, magna cum laude, in 1995, and her Bachelor of Arts in American studies from Tulane University, cum laude, in 1992. Among her other honors, she was a Harry S. Truman Scholar. Prior to being named president of Loyola, she held the office of senior vice president and chief of staff at Tulane University from 2015 to 2018. She also served at Tulane as associate provost for international affairs, the Felder-Fayard Professor of Law, and director of Tulane’s domestic violence clinic.

    Arriving at Loyola during the most challenging period in its financial history, President Tetlow successfully led a turnaround of the university, launching new academic programs and increasing enrollment and student retention. Loyola grew revenue and the endowment, improved its bond ratings, and returned to financial stability, all during a global pandemic. President Tetlow is beloved at Loyola for her compassionate and transparent leadership.

    Before that, President-Elect Tetlow served as a key part of Tulane University’s remarkable leap forward in admissions, rankings, diversity, research strength, and fundraising. As senior vice president and chief of staff to Tulane’s president, she played a crucial role in the strategy of culture change, adding new ambition to an institution already doing really well. And she led Tulane’s efforts to make meaningful progress on race and equity, and on addressing campus sexual assault.

    “Tania Tetlow has in abundance the qualities of leadership one needs to run a major university, among them discernment, patience, decisiveness, self-awareness, and magnanimity,” Father McShane said of her. “Her commitment to Jesuit pedagogy and to Fordham’s Jesuit, Catholic mission is both deep and well-informed. I shall rest easy with her in the office I have occupied for almost two decades.”

    The Board of Trustees and the search committee were deeply impressed by Tania Tetlow from the moment we met her. She is deeply rooted in, and a strong proponent of, Ignatian spirituality, and will be a champion of Fordham’s Jesuit, Catholic mission and identity. She has a deep understanding of and comprehensive vision for undergraduate liberal arts and sciences, the Gabelli School of Business, Fordham Law, and all of the graduate and professional schools of the University. With her permission, I am sharing the last paragraph of her candidacy letter to the Board of Trustees:

    “The generation of students we recruit craves institutions like Fordham with clear values. They also, however, want something more than virtue. Born during the Great Recession, made cynical by the events of their childhood, they want to fix a broken world. They push on assumptions, question authority, and have remarkable courage. What they don’t know (until we tell them) is that there is nothing more Jesuit than that.”

    Joseph M. O’Keefe, S.J., GSAS ’81, the provincial of the USA East Province of the Society of Jesus, said, “I am delighted to welcome Tania Tetlow to the Jesuits USA East Province, where she will lead one of our most important sponsored works, Fordham University. She has deep family ties to the University. Along with her extensive leadership experience, President-Elect Tetlow brings a thorough grounding in Jesuit, Ignatian, Catholic identity to her new mission. I look forward to collaborating closely with her in the coming years.”

    Tania Tetlow is a member of the Fordham family: her late father, Louis Mulry Tetlow, a psychologist and former Jesuit priest, received his Ph.D. from Fordham’s Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS) in 1974, four years after earning a master’s degree from Fordham; and President-Elect Tetlow’s mother, Elisabeth M. Tetlow, is also a double GSAS graduate, classes of 1967 and 1970, with master’s degrees in philosophy and theology. President-Elect Tetlow’s parents met and married at Fordham, and she was born in New York before moving to New Orleans.

    President-Elect Tetlow’s uncle Joseph Tetlow, S.J., served for eight years in Rome as head of the Secretariat for Ignatian Spirituality, and has held other important roles ranging from president of the Jesuit School of Theology at Berkeley to associate editor of America Magazine. Father Tetlow continues to write seminal texts on Ignatian spirituality, now from the Montserrat Jesuit Retreat House in Lake Dallas, Texas.

    Tania Tetlow is married to Gordon Stewart, originally from Glasgow, Scotland. They have a 9-year-old daughter, Lucy, and a stepson, Noah.

    This is a historic and exciting moment for Fordham. As a university that seeks to transform its students’ lives, we are preparing to be transformed by bold new leadership—leadership that will build upon Father McShane’s legacy of academic achievement and institutional growth. I know you all join me in giving Tania Tetlow a warm welcome to Fordham. We look forward to working with her in the years to come in furthering Fordham’s distinctly Jesuit mission in the greatest city of the world.

    Sincerely,
    Robert D. Daleo, Chair
    Fordham University Board of Trustees
    Gabelli School of Business, Class of 1972

    This content was originally published here.

  • Black woman says Delta moved her to back of plane for white flyers

    Black woman says Delta moved her to back of plane for white flyers

    A black woman has accused Delta Air Lines of discrimination after a flight attendant allegedly asked her to move to the back of a plane to make room for two white women.

    Camille Henderson said she was sitting near row 15 window during a Feb. 3 flight from Atlanta to San Francisco when the women, who were sitting in the aisle and middle seats in the row next to her, said they had first-class tickets, ABC 7 reported.

    “They felt like they were ticketed first-class seats, but they couldn’t provide the tickets,” Henderson told the news outlet, adding that the women continued the complaints for over an hour.

    Henderson recorded part of the exchange between the women and a flight attendant.

    “Unfortunately, my first-class seats are occupied,” one women is heard saying, according to a recording obtained by ABC 7.

    “They are what?” another person is heard saying.

    “They’re occupied,” the woman answered.

    Henderson told the station that flight attendants then came up with a solution to give the women more space at her expense.

    “Are you flying by yourself?” a person is heard asking Henderson, who replies that she is.

    “There’s a seat back there in aisle 34. It’s an aisle seat,” the apparent attendant says.

    Henderson, who said the crew did not ask the women to move, agreed reluctantly to go to the back row, according to the outlet.

    “I don’t want to make it a race thing, but instead of asking the two white women that were seated next to me (to move), in an attempt to accommodate them, they basically made me have to move,” she told ABC 7.

    “I just don’t know why I had to move because that was the seat that I paid for, that was my assigned seat,” she added. “As I’m walking back there it’s just humiliating. It’s like having the entire flight look at you and asking what’s going on.”

    Henderson said she was unsatisfied with what a Delta customer service rep she finally reached on the phone told her.

    “How were you humiliated for them to ask you to go to another seat?” the person can be heard asking in a recording she provided to the outlet — suggesting that there was no inconvenience since she was moved to another seat in economy.

    “You’re basically saying there’s nothing that you can do?” she told the rep.

    “No, not under these circumstances that I’m showing, ma’am,” the person was heard replying.

    An airline spokesperson told ABC7 in a statement: “We are looking into this situation to better understand what happened.

    “Delta has no tolerance for discrimination in any form and these allegations run counter to our deeply held values of respecting and honoring the diversity of our customers,” the rep added.

    Henderson vowed to never fly Delta again.

    “Me, as a black woman, I was displaced to make two white women comfortable. That doesn’t make any sense to me,” she told the outlet.

    This content was originally published here.

  • Flashback: Biden was against black female SCOTUS justices before he was for them

    Flashback: Biden was against black female SCOTUS justices before he was for them

    WASHINGTON, DC- Remember when Joe Biden said the Senate filibuster was a throwback to the Jim Crow era? How about when then-Senator Joe Biden used the filibuster against a black female judicial nominee put up by President George W. Bush?

    Guess it’s all a matter of what the agenda is.

    According to KPRC, Bush nominated Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court Janice Rogers Brown to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

    Rogers Brown was the first black female judge to be nominated for a seat on the federal bench.

    For nearly 2 years, Senate Democrats — including Joe Biden — filibustered the nomination of then-California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown to the D.C. Circuit.

    She likely would have been the first Black female Justice.

    Democrats only pretend to care about diversity. pic.twitter.com/SEmzoe09zG

    — 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) January 28, 2022

    Rogers Brown may have checked off two of the “boxes” that Biden is now apparently using to determine who to nominate for the soon-to-be-vacant Supreme Court Justice seat being vacated by retiring Associate Justice Stephen Breyer…she was a female and she was black.

    Unfortunately for the judge, she was also a libertarian-conservative.

    One decision Rogers Brown made involved a case where cigarette manufacturers were forced to put warning labels on packs and cartons of cigarettes. Rogers Brown dissented in the case, feeling it was government overreach.

    She also spoke ill of Roosevelt’s New Deal, which gave the U.S. Social Security and other programs, which she described as “the triumph of our socialist revolution.”

    Biden, however, was having none of Judge Rogers Brown back then.

    Despite his constant bloviating nowadays about his being a “champion” of civil rights and who is obsessed with the gender and amount of melanin his nominees possess, Biden filibustered her nomination and voted twice against her.

    In other words, when Biden himself was given the opportunity to “look beyond” race, he mailed it in.

    None of this was lost on Laura Ingraham on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle,” where she contrasted the before and after of Biden’s position on black female judicial nominees now and then.

    In 2005 when Rogers Brown was once again nominated for a seat on the federal bench, Biden again filibustered her nomination and voted against her. This time however, Rogers Brown was confirmed, despite Biden once again voting against her.

    So obsessed with not confirming a black female judge was Biden that when Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor announced her retirement, Rogers Brown was on Bush’s short list of potential replacements.

    However Biden, appearing on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” warned that if Bush nominated Brown, he would once again filibuster the nomination. That was three filibusters for one female judicial nominee by Biden.

    Joe Biden filibustered and voted against Janice Rogers Brown — TWICE! #SCOTUS pic.twitter.com/J4VSSsRlsD

    — Gayle Trotter (@gayletrotter) January 27, 2022

    Moderator John Roberts queried Biden as to why Rogers Brown would be filibustered by Senate Democrats after she had just been approved, to which Biden replied that the high court is a “totally different ballgame” because “a circuit court judge is bound by stare decisis. They don’t get to make new law.”

    That however was 2007 Joe Biden. The 2022 version of Joe Biden has had an epiphany, calling the Senate filibuster a “relic of the Jim Crow era.” However old Joe had no problem using the “relic” to keep a black woman off the highest court in the land.

    In fact, according to Marc Thiessen, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, Bush had a number of judges on his short list for the Supreme Court who maintained a legal philosophy opposite to Biden’s own. However the only one he promised to filibuster was Rogers Brown, the only black female on the list.

    Never forget what Democrats, & notably @JoeBiden, did to Janice Rogers Brown, Priscilla Owen – but more… Miguel Estrada. Destroying a good man specifically because he is Hispanic. We know this to be factually true, but the beltway media elites brush it aside. #RacistDCDemocrats https://t.co/2KKXUUsWlr

    — Chip Roy (@chiproytx) January 27, 2022

    Biden also led the charge in opposing yet another minority for a judicial post. In 2001, Bush nominated Hispanic judge Miguel Estrada to serve on the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.

    Estrada was targeted upon a request by liberal interest groups, who believed Estrada to be “especially dangerous” because “he is Latino, and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment.”

    Democrats were fearful the Republicans would be first to put up a Hispanic on the Supreme Court, and that couldn’t stand. Biden was also involved in opposing Estrada.

    So, for all Biden’s bloviating about the “historic” opportunity to have a black woman appointed to the Supreme Court, it would have likely happened some 20 years earlier if not for Biden’s own obstruction.

    WASHINGTON, DC — Whispers are that one of the potential nominees to replace U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer is a civil rights attorney who wants to get rid of qualified immunity for police and continue defunding them as well.

    Sherrilyn Ifill is one woman who President Joe Biden is reportedly considering as Breyer’s replacement on the Supreme Court.

    “The person I will nominate will be someone of extraordinary qualifications, character, experience, and integrity. And that person will be the first Black woman ever nominated to SCOTUS. It’s long overdue in my view.” — Biden pic.twitter.com/VOU8rl75J6

    — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 27, 2022

    Ifill is the president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), a civil rights law organization fighting for racial justice and equality, which is not connected to the NAACP despite the similarities in names.

    The organization’s motto is “DEFEND EDUCATE EMPOWER.”

    Thank you. But I lead the NAACP Legal Defense (@NAACP_LDF) which is an entirely separate organization from the NAACP (@NAACP).

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 21, 2022

    Previous lawyers who worked with LDF created the legal strategy that led to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, a transformative and monumental legal decision made in 1954 that legally ended decades of racial segregation in U.S. public schools.

    LDF Issues Statement on Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s Retirement – https://t.co/F3JiURADY1

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 27, 2022

    Who is Ifill and what are her views?

    According to Ifill’s biography on NAACP LDF’s website, she earned her J.D. degree from New York University School of Law in 1987.

    Ifill then began her career as a Fellow at the American Civil Liberties Union and later joined the staff of the LDF as an assistant counsel in 1988, where she litigated voting rights cases for five years.

    I can’t tell y’all how much hope this photo gives me. pic.twitter.com/k59pAQInPT

    — LaTosha Brown (@MsLaToshaBrown) January 28, 2022

    In 1993, Ifill left LDF to join the faculty at University of Maryland School of Law in Baltimore, where she taught civil procedure and constitutional law for over 20 years.

    How are you defining “success?”’The right’s entire motivating focus for decades has been centered on dismantling and burying the successes advanced under LBJ – the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act and the ambitions and programs of “the Great Society.” https://t.co/YT6ofsGIyO

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 21, 2022

    She also “pioneered a series of law clinics, including one of the earliest law clinics in the country focused on challenging legal barriers to the reentry of ex-offenders.”

    In 2007, Ifill wrote the book, “On the Courthouse Lawn: Confronting the Legacy of Lynching in the 21st Century.”

    Take the time. LISTEN. https://t.co/K4C4qytIiV

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 28, 2022

    In 2013, Ifill was invited back to LDF to lead the organization as its seventh director-counsel:

    “In that role, Ifill has increased the visibility and engagement of the organization in litigating cutting edge and urgent civil rights issues and elevating the organization’s decades-long leadership fighting voter suppression, inequity in education, and racial discrimination in the criminal justice system.

    Just so we’re clear. https://t.co/rCueWRxdFV

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 24, 2022

    “At critical moments during national political and civil rights crises Ifill’s voice and vision have powerfully influenced our national dialogue.

    “Ifill is a frequent public commentator on racial justice issues, known for her fact-based, richly contextualized analysis of complex racial issues.

    “Mistook” https://t.co/Kq0oiTy47k

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 25, 2022

    “She is a trusted and valued advisor to civic and community leaders, national civil rights colleagues, and business leaders.

    “In 2020, Ifill was named one of Glamour Magazine’s Women of the Year for her leadership of LDF, especially during a year that saw constant attacks on our democracy and nationwide protests against police violence in Black communities.

    “Glamour called Ifill an ‘unrelenting champion with a stellar reputation among civil rights leaders.’

    “Ifill was also named the 2020 Attorney of the Year by The American Lawyer, and was honored with a 2021 Spirit of Excellence Award by the American Bar Association.”

    The most awful part is hearing this young man say that “it really wasn’t that surprising..and it’s not just Orange County.” This is what our children must navigate. But entire laws are being passed to protect white students against the “discomfort” of learning the truth. https://t.co/O3BPYq5hWd

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 28, 2022

    She has also written several academic articles for law journals as well as op-eds, including, “How to Change Policing in America,” which appeared in Slate on June 3, 2020.

    Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

    In this op-ed, Ifill outlined her views of “long-overdue measures that federal, state, and local leaders must implement” to address what she called a “crisis” of “violent, racist policing.” She wrote in part:

    “Police officers are often described as law enforcement professionals. But professions have standards that govern member conduct, and membership can be revoked for standards violations.

    “Currently, officers fired for misconduct and brutality against innocent civilians can be hired by other departments.

    “We need to establish a national database of officers terminated for misconduct and a decertification system that makes them ineligible to work elsewhere as a police officer.”

    The evergreen end-of-the-first yr hatchet piece on a new President’s COS. Not feeling it. If you’re not talking abt the insanity & obstruction of the President’s opponents in frustrating his agenda & those of liberal & moderate Dems, you’re doing it wrong. https://t.co/UY72THjCdN

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 25, 2022

    Ifill complained about certain provisions in some police union contracts:

    “Police union contracts often contain several provisions that shield officers from accountability for misconduct, such as those protecting officers from questioning for days after an incident—including a killing—and those limiting misconduct-related discipline.

    “Many union contracts also protect officers who witness misconduct by fellow officers from any obligation to report or intervene, perpetuating the ‘blue wall of silence.’

    “City leaders must expend the political capital necessary to renegotiate provisions that contribute to officer impunity for misconduct.”

    Well done. Well done. https://t.co/EsQmpa7aMM

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 21, 2022

    Ifill also wrote that police funding needs to be “drastically” reduced:

    “It is critical that our city’s mayors be prepared to change their approach to police department funding in a way that prioritizes community funding support and a reimagined conception of public safety.

    “For example, movements to drastically reduce police funding are at the core of a revised vision of public safety that prioritizes social services, youth development, mental health, reentry support, and meaningful provisions for homeless individuals that strengthen community resources to proactively address underlying factors that can contribute to public safety concerns.

    “Most public safety issues and community conflicts do not require the intervention of an armed officer. It’s time to reimagine how we allocate our public safety dollars.”

    Ifill criticized the Department of Justice and pushed for “an immediate review of all” of the agency’s grant funding to police departments: She wrote:

    Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids federal funding of state and local programs that engage in racial discrimination.

    “Yet, despite providing over $2 billion in grant funding to police jurisdictions around the country, the Department of Justice has never fully enforced this provision.

    Love this. Happy Birthday @EricHolder! We fight on!

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 22, 2022

    “Minneapolis has received nearly $7 million in DOJ grants since 2009. There must be an immediate review of all DOJ grant funding to police departments to ensure compliance with Title VI.

    This is how this must be handled. https://t.co/wwswL8xveW

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 22, 2022

    “Federal funds should be withheld from departments that hire officers previously fired for misconduct or those with suspicious levels of in-custody deaths or assaults.

    “The House and Senate Judiciary Committees have oversight power over the DOJ—and must hold it accountable.”

    “Monsters exist, but they are too few in number to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are the common men, the functionaries ready to believe and to act without asking questions.” – Primo Levi#HolocaustRemembranceDay

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 27, 2022

    Ifill described qualified immunity as a “judge-made doctrine” that “must be urgently fixed by the courts” to limit its defense capability for police officers:

    “Qualified immunity, a defense that shields officials from the unforeseeable consequences of their reasonable acts, has been interpreted by courts so expansively that it now provides near-impunity for police officers who engage in unconstitutional acts of violence.

    Of course.

    — Sherrilyn Ifill (@Sifill_LDF) January 22, 2022

    “Civil rights legal groups, libertarian groups, and even some conservative judges oppose qualified immunity in its current form.

    “The U.S. Supreme Court has several cert petitions pending before it right now requesting review of this judge-made doctrine—one that must be urgently fixed by the courts. But Congress can also act to limit this defense.”

    Ifill ended her op-ed by suggesting that members of law enforcement are participants in “state-sanctioned killing.”

    Okay I’ll give you all your points but consider that it may be the Educational Standards movement that is providing the fuel. Consider how many parents had to try to support at home learning and common core math. All at once parents became acutely aware of what was being taught

    — Ralph Gravelle (@CrankyOldWelder) January 23, 2022

    She wrote in part:

    “Every police killing of an unarmed black man, woman, or child damages our country and wears away at our society’s fragile fabric.

    “These killings are a tragedy for families and communities. But they are also a stain on our nation’s very soul.

    “This time, it is critical that we place the onus on elected officials and policymakers to upend this system of state-sanctioned killing.”

    Queen Ifill,
    How are you? Individuals like Aaron Rodgers, you ignore them and put them totally in God’s hands.

    May God’s mercy and grace continue to be with us all!!

    Peace and Blessings,

    — Ver’Rette (@rette_ver) January 23, 2022

    Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today?  With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.  

    Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing!  (See image below.)  Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

    The post Flashback: Biden was against black female SCOTUS justices before he was for them appeared first on Law Enforcement Today.

    This content was originally published here.

  • Oprah Winfrey Reveals The Cast Of “The Color Purple” | Bossip

    Oprah Winfrey Reveals The Cast Of “The Color Purple” | Bossip

    Earlier this week, fans of Taraji P. Henson rejoiced when news broke that the actress would be portraying the iconic sassy blues singer Shug Avery in Blitz Bazawule’s forthcoming film adaptation of The Color Purple. 

    Source: Leon Bennett / Getty

    Now the rest of the star-studded cast of the film which will be a musical has been revealed, thanks to Oprah Winfrey. 

    While speaking to Vanity Fair, the inimitable talk show host, who also starred as “Sofia” in Steven Spielberg’s 1985 classic of the film, spilled the beans on the rest of the cast which will now include powerhouse singer Fantasia Taylor, Colman Domingo,  Danielle Brooks, Halle Bailey, Corey Hawkins, and Grammy-nominated star, H.E.R.

    Winfrey told the publication that she personally “called up” Danielle Brooks to audition for the role of Sofia. Upon Brooks landing the part, the famous television producer said she grew emotional, knowing that her legendary character was in good hands.

     “I didn’t think it was going to be emotional for me, but it ended up being emotional for me too!” she exclaimed. “She so wanted it. I was listening to her when we had Blitz’s assistant on, who was apologizing, saying, “So sorry that you have to do yet another audition, but something was wrong with the previous tape.” And then she goes, “I would audition as many times as I needed to because this means that much to me.”

    Winfrey continued:

    “She thought she was going to do her final, final audition. Instead, I popped up on the screen and said, “Sofia, So-FEEE-AAHHHHH!! It’s your day!”

    The Orange is The New Black alum recalled the exciting moment on her Instagram page.

    Source: Robin L Marshall / Getty

    “Firstly, Thank you God. Secondly, So beyond grateful to @oprah for trusting me with playing, once again, this powerhouse of a woman,” wrote Brooks. “She put her foot in that role and helped to change so many lives. I pray to do the same. The journey to getting to this moment was very humbling but I wouldn’t change it for the world!” she added.

    Euphoria standout, Colman Domingo is set to take on the role of “Mister”- the abusive and menacing husband of the film’s central character “Celie.”

    Source: Frazer Harrison / Getty

    “I love Colman for many reasons, but also because of his prolific ability to embody any character. There’s a presence that he carries that reminded me so much of young Mister,” the 68-year-old media maven gushed. “You know, he could be Danny’s son. Just the other day I was going through the costumes for him. The hats, the vests, all that stuff. And I’m just really excited about him.”

    Fantasia appeared as Celie on Broadway in 2007, blessing audience members with a stunning rendition of the musical’s classic hit “I’m Here.”

    Source: Jamie McCarthy / Getty

    Now the R&B star will reprise her role for Bazawule’s version of The Color Purple. If you remember, Whoopi Goldberg starred as the resilient character in Spielberg’s 1985 classic.

    “There is a rawness and a vulnerability to Fantasia. We all know she can sing, and she has to take on the song “I’m Here,” which is the anthem for women’s empowerment,” said Winfrey. “I think there’s no better time than this moment for it. It is an international battle cry for triumphing over adversity and empowering oneself and finding home within one’s self and one’s family. I think we’re gonna see a side of Fantasia that no one ever imagined.”

    Halle Bailey has been priming her acting jobs in a number of films recently including Disney’s upcoming live-action version of The Little Mermaid.

    Source: Frazier Harrison / Getty

    Now we’ll get to see the “Ungodly Hour” hitmaker take on a more dramatic role as “Nettie”, Celie’s sister.

    “She’s somebody whose presence you can feel in her absence—the memory of her, the feeling of her, the strength of her comes through, even when you’re only hearing her voice from her letters,” the OWN founder praised of Bailey’s theatrical prowess.

    Additionally, The Walking Dead’s Corey Hawkins will star as Mister’s loving son “Harpo” and H.E.R. will portray, his second wife, “Squeak.”

    Source: Kevin Winter / Getty

    Source: Marcus Ingram / Getty

    Wow oh wow, this cast is good, and in the words of the legendary Winfrey, “This ain’t your mama’s Color Purple.”

    It will also be exciting to see what kind of twist Blitz Bazawule brings to the classic movie. You might be familiar with the director’s work on films such as The Burial of Kojo and Beyoncé’s melanated visual album Black is King. Winfrey will also help to produce the new film alongside screenwriter Scott Sanders.

    Will you be watching when The Color Purple debuts? Tell us down below!

    This content was originally published here.

  • Dissociative Identity Disorder on TikTok: Why More Teens Are Self-Diagnosing With DID Because of Social Media | Teen Vogue

    Dissociative Identity Disorder on TikTok: Why More Teens Are Self-Diagnosing With DID Because of Social Media | Teen Vogue

    “I don’t share my traumas,” Gimena said. “I don’t show my alters either. I don’t have any videos up there that are just for the purpose of showing the video.”

    “If I post videos of the darker information, if I talk about how scary it is, then there will be a lot of comments like, ‘Oh, you’re attention-seeking.’”

    Her videos pop up while exploring popular tags like #dissociativeidentitydisorder or #didsystem, and while she’s a consistent contributor to TikTok’s DID community, she doesn’t like to consume other content from people with DID, which can be triggering for her.

    Some corners of this community have been criticized, sometimes by other community members, for glamorizing the condition and experience of trauma. Accusations of flippancy when discussing and showcasing certain behaviors, such as “switching,” which is when an individual changes alters and can be triggered by stress, has fueled the ongoing debate as to whether TikTok is a safe place for folks with certain mental health conditions. Since switching is typically involuntary, some wonder how people on social media are able to film their switches to post. In a comment on the video linked above, Gimena said she films her episodes when she’s able to for safety, as recommended by a therapist.

    But dissociative identity disorder can be extremely isolating, points out Aubry Bakker, PhD, a neuropsychologist who has extensive experience working with teens diagnosed with DID, and co-founder of wellness boutique MOVMNT. Participating in TikTok’s DID community can remedy some of that isolation, she said. And having filmed moments can help fill gaps in memory and help individuals get in touch with their identities.

    While there isn’t a wealth of information about DID in adolescents, many young people on TikTok list DID as an identifier in their bio. Some indicate a diagnosis, others don’t. The rise in people on social media claiming to have systems has sparked controversy both on and off the platform, as “fakeclaiming,” or accusing an individual of faking their symptoms, runs rampant in comment sections and subreddit threads.

    “I believe the diversity of human colors, hair textures, and body shapes are something to be proud of.”

    Eiza Wolfe is no stranger to this. As a 19-year-old who says she was professionally diagnosed with DID last year, she uses TikTok to make sense of the condition and share her experience through posting, mostly, lighthearted skits. Still, regardless of what she posts, her content has been reposted to fakeclaiming threads.

    “But if I post videos of the darker information, if I talk about how scary it is, then there will be a lot of comments like, ‘Oh, you’re attention-seeking, you’re posting this because you want attention,’” Wolfe said. “So there’s just really no way to win.”

    This is the dangerous dance being played out on social media. While many applaud the de-stigmatization of mental health conditions by increasing visibility, users who do open up about their symptoms continue to be met with intense criticism.

    At one point, Wolfe says she posted her medical diagnosis documents with the hope of quelling threats of doxxing from internet trolls. She’s since deleted the post, but says the near-constant accusations of fakery targeted at her and other members of TikTok’s DID community are triggering.

    No one should be pressured to present proof of their trauma or medical diagnosis, but still there are individuals on social media spreading misinformation about DID, which only adds to the confusion of those already questioning their mental health.

    “Almost all of my 14-22-years-olds that I work with right now have self-diagnosed something using TikTok,” said New York-based psychologist Rebecca Semel, PhD. “When a client says, ‘I saw this TikTok…,’ I’m waiting with bated breath. Where are we going with this?” Semel caveats that TikTok can be helpful, calling it “an accessible platform” that “gives a lot of tools and strategies that are … not so far from what I would suggest.” But, she says it can also be a place where people gather mental health advice and information from unreliable sources.

    “Identifying a mental health condition as misdiagnosed as DID is hard to begin with, and social media is both making it better known, and creating room for more misunderstanding.”

    Worldwide, experts are taking note. A study published over the summer identified “TikTok tics” as what researchers believe to be a mass sociogenic illness, or the spontaneous spread of behaviors or emotions through a cohesive group — in this case, young women. As tic and tourette syndrome content increased on TikTok, neurology clinics saw an increase in patients presenting tics, specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic. More interestingly, experts believe many of these tics are not performative. Doctors say the tics are very real, though they don’t necessarily indicate a patient has Tourette syndrome. Instead, it may be part of a functional neurological disorder, which is a type of condition that isn’t related to underlying disease. According to the Wall Street Journal, doctors recommend cognitive behavioral therapy and abstaining from TikTok as treatment. Donald Gilbert, a neurologist at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center who specializes in pediatric movement disorders and Tourette syndrome, told the Wall Street Journal that anxiety and depression, which increased during the pandemic, can manifest through physical symptoms, and that doctors say the physical symptoms are often ones that patients have seen others perform before.

    This content was originally published here.

  • Only 2 Black head coaches left in NFL after Brian Flores firing

    Only 2 Black head coaches left in NFL after Brian Flores firing

    Only two Black head coaches left in NFL after Brian Flores firing

    “It was an honor to represent the franchise and lead this group of men,” former Miami Dolphins head coach Brian Flores said.

    Loading the player…

    The Miami Dolphins announced Monday that head coach Brian Flores is out after three seasons with the franchise.

    “The Miami Dolphins announced today that head coach Brian Flores has been relieved of his duties,” the team said in an official statement, ESPN reports. “Flores completed his third season as head coach with a 24-25 record.

    Flores accepted the job as head coach in 2019, hours after helping the Patriots shut down the high-scoring Los Angeles Rams for a 13-3 victory in Super Bowl LIII.

    “I want to thank the Miami Dolphins for the opportunity to be the head coach of this team for the last three seasons,” said Flores in a statement Monday. “It was an honor to represent the franchise and lead this group of men. I am grateful most of all for the players, coaches and support staff who gave everything they had on a daily basis to help us win games. They deserve the credit for any success on the field, and it was the honor of a lifetime for me to go to work with them everyday.” 

    yeah this one makes no sense. https://t.co/VlRk3yAzN0

    — Eric Ebron (@Ebron85)

    “I have always believed that leadership is really about service, and I did my best to serve the players, the staff and the organization everyday. I believe in this team and will always value the relationships my family and I made here,” he continued.

    In his own statement, Team owner Stephen Ross said: “I made a decision today to part ways with Brian Flores. After evaluating where we are as an organization and what we need going forward to improve, I determined that key dynamics of our football organization weren’t functioning at a level I want it to be and felt that this decision was in the best interest of the Miami Dolphins.

    I believe we have a talented young roster in place and have the opportunity to be much better in 2022. I want to thank Brian for his hard work and wish him nothing but the best in the future.”

    Wait… they are firing Flores because his relationship with Tua deteriorated while management openly tried to trade for Deshaun Watson all season? 🤔🤔🤔 https://t.co/U1PzADLGnK

    — Patrick Allen (@RPatrickAllen)

    More than 60% of NFL players are Black, and now that Flores has been relieved of his duties, there remain only two Black head coaches in the league, 66-year-old David Culley of the Houston Texans and Pittsburgh Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin, the third longest-tenured coach in the NFL.  

    When Tomlin was hired in 2007 there were six Black head coaches in the NFL. It’s a stark reminder of the NFL’s decades-old Rooney Rule, which requires teams to interview at least one minority candidate when filling head coach and general manager positions.

    Many believe the NFL continues to make a mockery of the Rooney Rule by continuing to fail to address the league’s lack of diversity. 

    “Clearly, we are not where we want to be on this level,” NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said in 2018. “We have a lot of work that’s gone into not only the Rooney Rule but our policies overall. It’s clear we need to change and do something different.”

    “There’s no reason to expect we’re going to have a different outcome next year without those kinds of changes,” he added.

    USA Today’s NFL Editor Doug Farrar tweeted, “In an NFL where well over 70% of the players are Black, there are now two Black head coaches. Two. 6.25% of the group. Keep that in mind as the league is shoving “Inspire Change” down your throats.”

    In an NFL where well over 70% of the players are Black, there are now two Black head coaches.

    Two.

    6.25% of the group.

    Keep that in mind as the league is shoving “Inspire Change” down your throats.

    — Doug Farrar ✍ (@NFL_DougFarrar)

    One Twitter user responded, “That is not by accident….AT ALL. And imagine getting fired with a winning record…how often does that happen…and when it does happen who does it happen to?….wild times. NFL “say one thing, do another.”

    President Joe Biden has also commented on the lack of Black coaches in the NFL. During an interview that aired at halftime of the 2021 Super Bowl, theGrio previously reported. Biden said in part, “I don’t understand why they cannot find — because they exist, so many African American coaches that are qualified, that should be in the pros, in my view.”

    Hours after firing Flores on Monday, Ross shot down rumors that he is eying Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh to fill the vacancy. Ross is an alumnus of the university.

    “I have no coach in mind at this point. We’re going to do a thorough review and interview process,” Ross said. “And Jim Harbaugh, I love Jim Harbaugh. He had the opportunity once before to come to the Miami Dolphins. But he’s at the University of Michigan. … That is my school I graduated from, and I’m very involved in it.”

    Flores wasn’t the only head coach that was curbed on what has been dubbed Black Monday. The Denver Broncos canned coach Vic Fangio. The Chicago Bears parted ways with head coach Matt Nagy and general manager Ryan Pace. Additionally, Mike Zimmer was fired as head coach of the Minnesota Vikings, and Rick Spielman was released as general manager. 

    Have you subscribed to theGrio podcasts “Dear Culture” or “Acting Up?” Download our newest episodes now!

    This content was originally published here.

  • ABC suspends Whoopi Goldberg over Holocaust race remarks

    ABC suspends Whoopi Goldberg over Holocaust race remarks

    NEW YORK (AP) — Whoopi Goldberg was suspended for two weeks Tuesday as co-host of “The View” because of what the head of ABC News called her “wrong and hurtful comments” about Jews and the Holocaust.

    “While Whoopi has apologized, I’ve asked her to take time to reflect and learn about the impact of her comments. The entire ABC News organization stands in solidarity with our Jewish colleagues, friends, family and communities,” ABC News President Kim Godwin said in a statement.

    The suspension came a day after Goldberg’s comment during a discussion on “The View” that race was not a factor in the Holocaust. Goldberg apologized hours later and again on Tuesday’s morning episode, but the original remark drew condemnation from several prominent Jewish leaders.

    “My words upset so many people, which was never my intention,” she said Tuesday morning. “I understand why now and for that I am deeply, deeply grateful because the information I got was really helpful and helped me understand some different things.”

    Goldberg made her original comments during a discussion on the show Monday about a Tennessee school board’s banning of “Maus,” a Pulitzer Prize-winning graphic novel about the Nazi death camps during World War II. She said the Holocaust was “not about race … it’s about man’s inhumanity to other man.”

    “I misspoke,” Goldberg said at the opening of Tuesday’s show.

    The flare-up over Goldberg’s remarks this week highlighted the enduring complexity of some race-related issues, including the widespread but strongly contested notion that only people of color can be victims of racism.

    “Effective immediately, I am suspending Whoopi Goldberg for two weeks for her wrong and hurtful comments,” Godwin said in her statement.

    “The View” brought on Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League and author of “It Could Happen Here,” on Tuesday to discuss why her words had been hurtful.

    “Jewish people at the moment are feeling besieged,” Greenblatt said.

    Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, praised Goldberg for being outspoken over the years on social issues but said he struggled to understand her statement on the Holocaust.

    “The only explanation that I have for it is that there is a new definition of racism that has been put out there in the public recently that defines racism exclusively as the targeting of people of color. And obviously history teaches us otherwise,” Cooper said.

    “Everything about Nazi Germany and about the targeting of the Jews and about the Holocaust was about race and racism. That’s the unfortunate, unassailable historic fact,” he said.

    Kenneth L. Marcus, chairman of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, linked Goldberg’s remarks to broader misconceptions of the Holocaust, Jewish identity and antisemitism.

    “In her error, she was reflecting a misunderstanding of Jewish identity that is both widespread and dangerous that is sometimes described as erasive antisemitism,” said Marcus, who is the author of ‘The Definition of Anti-Semitism.’

    “It is the notion that Jews should be viewed only as being white, privileged oppressors,” he said. “It denies Jewish identity and involves a whitewashing of Jewish history.”

    Marcus referred to the use of anti-Jewish stereotypes “about being powerful, controlling and sinister,” coupled with downplaying or denying antisemitism.

    Jill Savitt, president and CEO of the National Center for Civil and Human Rights, offered a measured view of Goldberg’s comments.

    “No one can get into Whoopi Goldberg’s head, … But I think what she’s trying to say is that the Holocaust is about hatred. It’s about inhumanity. It’s about what human beings will do to one another that is inhumane,” Savitt said.

    Complex issues demand more than placing blame, she said.

    “I think people are not as quick to give anybody the benefit of the doubt these days, which is a shame because in order to work through painful, complicated, difficult issues, especially painful histories,” Savitt said, “we could give each other a little more grace because people are going to make mistakes or they’re going to say things that offend.”

    In Israel, being Jewish is rarely seen in racial terms, in part because of the country’s great diversity. Yet Jewish identity goes far beyond religion. Israelis typically refer to the “Jewish people” or “Jewish nation,” describing a group or civilization bound together by a shared history, culture, language and traditions and deep ties to Jewish communities overseas.

    On “The View” Monday, Goldberg, who is Black, had expressed surprise that some Tennessee school board members were uncomfortable about nudity in “Maus.”

    “I mean, it’s about the Holocaust, the killing of 6 million people, but that didn’t bother you?” she said. “If you’re going to do this, then let’s be truthful about it. Because the Holocaust isn’t about race. No, it’s not about race.”

    She continued on that line despite pushback from some of her fellow panelists.

    The U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington responded to Goldberg with a tweet.

    “Racism was central to Nazi ideology. Jews were not defined by religion, but by race. Nazi racist beliefs fueled genocide and mass murder,” it said.

    That tweet also included a link to the museum’s online encyclopedia, which said the Nazis attributed negative stereotypes about Jews to a biologically determined racial heritage.

    Savitt said while Jews are not a race, Nazis made Judaism a a race in their effort to create a racial hierarchy that “borrowed this, it should be said, from the American conversation about racial superiority and eugenics.”

    On Twitter, there were several calls for Goldberg’s firing, where it appeared caught up in the familiar debates between left and right.

    Greenblatt said the talk show, in the market for a new co-host following last summer’s departure of Meghan McCain, should consider hiring a Jewish woman to keep the issue of antisemitism in the forefront.

    AP Television Writer Lynn Elber in Los Angeles, AP Writer Ron Harris in Atlanta and correspondent Luis Andres Henao in Princeton, N.J., contributed to this report.

    This content was originally published here.

  • Civil Rights Activist Ida B. Wells To Be Honored By Barbie With Her Own Doll

    Civil Rights Activist Ida B. Wells To Be Honored By Barbie With Her Own Doll

    Ida B Wells Portrait (Colorized)

    Source: Gado / Getty

    Barbie has stepped their game up in the diversity and inclusion arena. The American toy company Mattel, Inc., which started manufacturing Barbie dolls in 1959, has gone through a host of changes over the years. Now representing the modern world, which includes various complexions, shapes, and occupations, the brand has used their platform to highlight the lives of women who have shifted history.

    Joining the list of historical Black figures who have been morphed into Barbie Dolls is Civil Rights trailblazer and Activist, Ida B. Wells. Wells, an investigative journalist, educator, and one of the original founders of the NAACP, fearlessly dedicated her life to fighting for the equality of African American people. She used her journalistic talents to report the racial injustices that occurred in the South during that time.

    Barbie Makes Doll To Honor Civil Rights Historical Icon Ida B. Wells https://t.co/kkEk1WLH0c

    — Black Enterprise (@blackenterprise) January 9, 2022

    Barbie’s latest collection, Inspiring Women, is part of the Dream Gap campaign. This initiative was launched by the brand with the goal of inspiring young girls through representation. Wells is one of many figures chosen to empower others through her story of strength and resilience.

    Mattel has honored Katherine Johnson, famed NASA Mathematician and Physicist; Rosa Parks, Civil Rights Activist; Sara Mama, Soccer Player; Ibtihaj Muhammad, Fencing Champion; Gabby Douglas, Gymnastics Champion; Ava Duvernay, Film Director; Nicola Adams Obe, Boxing Champion; Naomi Osaka, Tennis star; and Yara Shahidi, Actress and Social Activist with their own personal Barbie doll.

    The Ida B. Wells Barbie doll is expected to be release on January 17, 2022, and was available for pre-order on Amazon, but is currently sold out.

    DON’T MISS…

    Hollywood, Get On It: 10 Black Women Who Need Their Own Biopic

    6 Life Quotes By Ida B. Wells

    This content was originally published here.

  • Inside Jerry Falwell Jr.’s Unlikely Rise and Precipitous Fall at Liberty University | Vanity Fair

    Inside Jerry Falwell Jr.’s Unlikely Rise and Precipitous Fall at Liberty University | Vanity Fair

    Becki said she didn’t report the traumatic experience at the time because she felt guilty about the affair. In her mind, she deserved it. A few months later, Becki told Jerry and two lawyers about the incident. Becki said it also took her time to process that what happened could have been a form of assault. “I said no. Just because we had sex before does not mean he has a free ticket to my body.”

    Granda and the Falwells hurtled toward a blowup. Months later, a lawyer representing Granda wrote a letter to Jerry’s attorney that stated Granda wanted Jerry to buy him out of the hostel for $2 million ($1.1 million in cash and $50,000 a year for 20 years, according to a letter Granda’s lawyer sent on October 15, 2019). Jerry refused. Granda’s attorney, Aaron Resnick, did not respond to a request for comment.

    Granda’s emotional state deteriorated and he talked about suicide. Becki shared a text Granda sent around this time: “My life is absolutely ruined. When they find my lifeless body hanging in the woods, please make sure [my dog] Logan is returned to my family. Goodbye.”

    In June 2020, Granda and Jerry reached the point of no return. “Since you’re okay with ruining my life, I am going to take the kamikaze route,” Granda texted Jerry. According to Jerry, Granda said he would tell people Jerry participated in the affair: “Revenge is coming soon.… I’m taking everyone down with me with my side of the story,” Granda texted. Becki worried Granda could release clips of the sex tapes she said she had shared with him.

    “You should by now understand that I will not be extorted,” Jerry texted back. “I have always treated you fairly and been restrained in response to your threats because I did not wish to ruin your life. Going forward, stop contacting me and my family.”

    With Granda threatening to go kamikaze, you would think Jerry would have kept a low profile. Instead, he spent 2020 brazenly courting controversy—as if he was trying to get fired. The year began with Jerry holding a bizarre press conference calling for rural portions of Virginia to secede and join West Virginia. In March, he tweeted a conspiracy theory that COVID-19 might be a North Korean bioweapon. When campuses across the country went into lockdown and sent students home that spring, Jerry kept Liberty open. But that was just a warm-up. Two days after George Floyd’s murder on Memorial Day, Jerry tweeted a photo of a face mask he printed with a racist photo from Virginia governor Ralph Northam’s medical school yearbook. It showed people posing in blackface and a KKK hood. Jerry tweeted he would only wear a mask that had “Governor Blackface” on it. Protests and violence erupted in Lynchburg, a city with a large Black population. Jerry refused to apologize, even after Black Liberty staffers, including the head of diversity retention as well as top football and basketball players, quit the school in protest. After nearly two weeks of chaos, Jerry grudgingly deleted the tweet.

    But Jerry couldn’t break his destructive social media habit. On Sunday morning, August 2, Jerry was relaxing with Becki and Caroline at the farm when he announced he had posted a photo on Instagram and held the phone up. So much was wrong about the picture: Jerry had his pants unzipped and what looked like a rum and Coke in one hand, with his other arm wrapped around a pregnant woman with her shorts unzipped and stomach showing.

    “During my freshman year, my buddy and I went to a convenience store and I drank a few beers. I thought, I’m the wild one.”

    Becki and Caroline were mortified. “We were like, that’s terrible! Take it down!” Becki recalled. Jerry didn’t see the big deal. The photo was taken during a costume party aboard billionaire Rick Hendrick’s 160-foot yacht. He was dressed as the main character Julian from the Canadian sitcom Trailer Park Boys. The drink in his hand was the Blk brand mineral water he ordered off Amazon, and the woman was Becki’s assistant. Jerry deleted the photo. But it was too late. Someone had taken a screenshot, and the media was all over the controversy.

    On August 7, the Liberty board of trustees put Jerry on indefinite leave. Jerry said he wanted to fight the decision but didn’t have the energy. Since that July, he had been suffering from shortness of breath, dizzy spells, and slurred speech. He said he was eventually diagnosed with pulmonary emboli, a form of blood clots in the lungs. He was hospitalized when his blood oxygen fell to 77 percent. “The lungs were blocked up with clots. The pressure in the right side of my heart was triple what it should have been, and it was swollen. I barely made it to the car when we went to the hospital,” Jerry said.

    Jerry said he was in a diminished state when a Reuters reporter named Aram Roston emailed to say Granda had given an on-the-record interview. Granda was alleging Jerry liked to watch Granda and Becki have sex, did Jerry have a comment? Borrowing a page from Trump’s playbook, Jerry wanted to preempt Granda’s story with one of his own, but he was too weak to go on television. On August 23, he sent a statement to the Washington Examiner. It acknowledged Granda and Becki’s affair but claimed Granda fabricated wild accusations about Jerry’s involvement as part of an extortion plot.

    Before publication, Jerry and Becki sat their kids down. “We never told them until the day before it was about to hit,” Becki recalled. “I didn’t want my kids to know. You know, how embarrassing is that?”

    A day later, Jerry says a member of Liberty’s board called Jerry and said if he didn’t step down, he would be fired. Jerry resigned.

    Since his resignation, Jerry has been locked in a bitter feud with Liberty. The board fired Jerry’s son Trey and barred Jerry and Becki from setting foot on campus, even though their daughter is a senior and Jerry’s parents are buried there. Two days after Jerry’s resignation, an anonymous former Liberty student and friend of Trey’s told Politico that Becki had performed oral sex on him at the Falwell’s home in 2008 when he was 22. Becki denied the allegation to me, calling it “so ridiculous.” In April 2021, the board sued Jerry for $40 million to claw back his eight-figure severance package. The trustees said Jerry committed fraud when he negotiated a lucrative new contract in 2019 without telling the university he was being extorted by Granda—information the trustees said they were entitled to before they renewed Jerry’s multimillion-dollar deal. The lawsuit included accounts of Jerry and Becki’s booze-filled nights in Miami clubs and alleged Jerry showed up at Liberty when he “smelled of alcohol.” Jerry and Becki denied the allegations. “The lawsuit was my worst day,” Becki said. “I just remember crying all day long. It was our own people coming after us.”

    Jerry said the board held him to an unfair standard. Jerry’s reasoning is that he was a university president, not a pastor. His brother, Jonathan, who preached every Sunday at their father’s church, was the pious one. “Liberty never had any rules for whether the president or any staff member could drink alcohol,” Jerry said, sounding like the lawyer he was trained to be. I told him the argument sounded like an extreme case of rationalization given that he was the leader of a school that fines female students for wearing a dress more than two inches above the knee. But Jerry said the current leadership has also broken rules—and that some school leaders drank alcohol. “I couldn’t believe the board was shocked about that,” Jerry said. The suit is ongoing.

    Getting rid of Jerry didn’t stanch Liberty’s image crisis. In August, 12 women filed a federal class-action lawsuit alleging the university violated Title IX law by discriminating against women who made allegations of sexual assault and harassment. According to the suit, which is proceeding, Liberty staff discouraged victims from reporting abuse and fined some for violating Liberty’s “commitment to Biblical principles of purity and abstinence.” Jerry’s successor, Jerry Prevo, released a statement calling the allegations “troubling” and added: “Liberty University will not tolerate Title IX violations, sexual abuse or sexual assault in any form at any time.” In October, Scott Lamb, Liberty’s former senior vice president for communications, sued Liberty in federal court, claiming he was fired after raising red flags about the way the university responded to sexual assault allegations. Prevo called Lamb’s allegations false in a statement. His suit is in progress.

    In exile, Jerry and Becki’s grievances festered, like Trump’s after his election loss. It’s no accident, Jerry said, that forces marshaled against him in the heat of the 2020 presidential campaign. He pointed out that Granda was advised by Kurt Bardella, at the time a PR adviser for the anti-Trump Lincoln Project. “They wanted to get Jerry out of the picture for the election cycle because he got credited for bringing all the evangelicals around,” Becki said.

    Jerry also suspected that Franklin Graham, son of the late Billy Graham, used the scandal to expand the Graham family’s influence over Liberty. Franklin Graham’s son Will was named vice chairman of Liberty’s board. Prevo is also a Graham ally. Jerry said Franklin Graham had also once told him that he wanted to start a Billy Graham University, but it didn’t get off the ground. In September 2020, Jerry and Franklin got into an argument over who should get credit for Liberty’s success. “I said, ‘My dad built the foundation, but I built the house. And Franklin got furious. He said, ‘You didn’t build it!’ You should have heard the jealousy in Franklin’s voice,” Jerry recalled. According to Jerry, Franklin Graham told him his future in the Christian world is over. “He said, ‘You’ll never be anything in evangelical circles again.’ ” Graham, through a spokesperson, declined to comment.

    Jerry said that being on the receiving end of evangelicals’ moral opprobrium has fundamentally turned him away from the movement. He believes in Christ, he said, but not the church. “Nothing in history has done more to turn people away from Christianity than organized religion,” he said. “The religious elite has got this idea that somehow their sins aren’t as bad as everyone else’s,” Jerry said. Listening to Jerry, it made me think he convinced himself Liberty wasn’t the fundamentalist school that it is. “He would tell reporters that we don’t mind if gay and lesbians come here. I would tell him, ‘I don’t know what you’re talking about,’ ” recalled Lamb.

    This content was originally published here.

  • The Magic of Moss and What It Teaches Us About the Art of Attentiveness to Life at All Scales – The Marginalian

    The Magic of Moss and What It Teaches Us About the Art of Attentiveness to Life at All Scales – The Marginalian

    “Attention without feeling,” Mary Oliver observed in her magnificent memoir of love and loss, “is only a report.” In Gathering Moss: A Natural and Cultural History of Mosses (public library) — an extraordinary celebration of smallness and the grandeur of life, as humble yet surprisingly magical as its subject — botanist Robin Wall Kimmerer extends an uncommon and infectious invitation to drink in the vibrancy of life at all scales and attend to our world with befitting vibrancy of feeling.

    One of the world’s foremost bryologists, Kimmerer is a scientist blessed with the rare privilege of belonging to a long lineage of storytellers — her family comes from the Bear Clan of the Potawatomi. There is a special commonality between her heritage and her scientific training — a profound respect for all life forms, whatever their size — coupled with a special talent for rendering that respect contagious, which places her prose in the same taxon as Mary Oliver and Annie Dillard and Thoreau. Indeed, if Thoreau was a poet and philosopher who became a de facto naturalist by the sheer force of poetic observation, despite having no formal training in science, Kimmerer is a formally trained scientist whose powers of poetic observation and contemplative reflection render her a de facto poet and philosopher. (So bewitching is her book, in fact, that it inspired Elizabeth Gilbert’s beautiful novel The Signature of All Things, which is how I first became aware of Kimmerer’s mossy masterwork.)

    Mosses, to be sure, are scientifically impressive beyond measure — the amphibians of vegetation, they were among the first plants to emerge from the ocean and conquer the land; they number some 22,000 species, whose tremendous range of size parallels the height disparity between a blueberry bush and a redwood; they inhabit nearly every ecosystem on earth and grow in places as diverse as the branch of an oak and the back of a beetle. But beyond their scientific notoriety, mosses possess a kind of lyrical splendor that Kimmerer unravels with enchanting elegance — splendor that has to do with what these tiny organisms teach us about the art of seeing.

    She uses the experience of flying — an experience so common we’ve come to take its miraculousness for granted — to illustrate our all too human solipsism:

    Between takeoff and landing, we are each in suspended animation, a pause between chapters of our lives. When we stare out the window into the sun’s glare, the landscape is only a flat projection with mountain ranges reduced to wrinkles in the continental skin. Oblivious to our passage overhead, other stories are unfolding beneath us. Blackberries ripen in the August sun; a woman packs a suitcase and hesitates at her doorway; a letter is opened and the most surprising photograph slides from between the pages. But we are moving too fast and we are too far away; all the stories escape us, except our own.

    We, of course, need not rise to the skies in order to fall into the chronic patterns of our myopia and miss most of what is going on around us — we do this even in the familiar microcosm of a city block. Kimmerer considers how our growing powers of technologically aided observation have contributed to our diminished attentiveness:

    We poor myopic humans, with neither the raptor’s gift of long-distance acuity, nor the talents of a housefly for panoramic vision. However, with our big brains, we are at least aware of the limits of our vision. With a degree of humility rare in our species, we acknowledge there is much we can’t see, and so contrive remarkable ways to observe the world. Infrared satellite imagery, optical telescopes, and the Hubble space telescope bring vastness within our visual sphere. Electron microscopes let us wander the remote universe of our own cells. But at the middle scale, that of the unaided eye, our senses seem to be strangely dulled. With sophisticated technology, we strive to see what is beyond us, but are often blind to the myriad sparkling facets that lie so close at hand. We think we’re seeing when we’ve only scratched the surface. Our acuity at this middle scale seems diminished, not by any failing of the eyes, but by the willingness of the mind. Has the power of our devices led us to distrust our unaided eyes? Or have we become dismissive of what takes no technology but only time and patience to perceive? Attentiveness alone can rival the most powerful magnifying lens.

    But the rewards of attentiveness can’t be forced into manifesting — rather, they are surrendered to. In a sentiment that calls to mind Rebecca Solnit’s spectacular essay on how we find ourselves by getting lost, Kimmerer writes:

    A Cheyenne elder of my acquaintance once told me that the best way to find something is not to go looking for it. This is a hard concept for a scientist. But he said to watch out of the corner of your eye, open to possibility, and what you seek will be revealed. The revelation of suddenly seeing what I was blind to only moments before is a sublime experience for me. I can revisit those moments and still feel the surge of expansion. The boundaries between my world and the world of another being get pushed back with sudden clarity an experience both humbling and joyful.

    Mosses and other small beings issue an invitation to dwell for a time right at the limits of ordinary perception. All it requires of us is attentiveness. Look in a certain way and a whole new world can be revealed.

    Learning to see mosses is more like listening than looking. A cursory glance will not do it. Starting to hear a faraway voice or catch a nuance in the quiet subtext of a conversation requires attentiveness, a filtering of all the noise, to catch the music. Mosses are not elevator music; they are the intertwined threads of a Beethoven quartet.

    Echoing Richard Feynman’s iconic monologue on knowledge and mystery, Kimmerer adds:

    Knowing the fractal geometry of an individual snowflake makes the winter landscape even more of a marvel. Knowing the mosses enriches our knowing of the world.

    This knowing, at its most intimate, is a function of naming — for words are how we come to know meanings. Kimmerer considers this delicate dialogue between a thing’s essence and its name:

    Having words for these forms makes the differences between them so much more obvious. With words at your disposal, you can see more clearly. Finding the words is another step in learning to see.

    Having the words also creates an intimacy with the plant that speaks of careful observation.

    Intimacy gives us a different way of seeing, when visual acuity is not enough.

    The remarkable diversity of moss varieties known and named only adds to the potentiality for intimacy with the world at all scales. But among this vast multiplicity of mosses is one particular species inhabiting the small caves carved by glaciers into the lakeshore, which alone embodies immense wisdom about the mystery and meaning of life. Kimmerer writes:

    Schistostega pennata, the Goblins’ Gold, is unlike any other moss. It is a paragon of minimalism, simple in means, rich in ends. So simple you might not recognize it as a moss at all. The more typical mosses on the bank outside spread themselves to meet the sun. Such robust leaves and shoots, though tiny, require a substantial amount of solar energy to build and maintain. They are costly in solar currency. Some mosses need full sun to survive, others favor the diffuse light of clouds, while Schistostega lives on the clouds’ silver lining alone.

    This singular species subsists solely on the light reflections emanating from the lake’s surface, which provide one-tenth of one percent of the solar energy that direct sunlight does. And yet in this unlikely habitat, Schistostega has emerged as a most miraculous jewel of life:

    The shimmering presence of Schistostega is created entirely by the weft of nearly invisible threads crisscrossing the surface of the moist soil. It glows in the dark, or rather it glitters in the half light of places which scarcely feel the sun.

    Each filament is a strand of individual cells strung together like beads shimmering on a string. The walls of each cell are angled, forming interior facets like a cut diamond. It is these facets which cause Schistostega to sparkle like the tiny lights of a far-away city. These beautifully angled walls capture traces of light and focus it inward, where a single large chloroplast awaits the gathering beam of light. Packed with chlorophyll ad membranes of exquisite complexity, the chloroplast converts the light energy into a stream of flowing electrons. This is the electricity of photosynthesis, turning sun into sugar, spinning straw into gold.

    But more than a biological marvel, Schistostega presents a parable of patience and its bountiful rewards — an allegory for meeting the world not with grandiose entitlement but with boundless generosity of spirit; for taking whatever it has to offer and giving back an infinity more. Kimmerer writes:

    Rain on the outside, fire on the inside. I feel a kinship with this being whose cold light is so different from my own. It asks very little from the world and yet glitters in response.

    Timing is everything. Just for a moment, in the pause before the earth rotates again into night, the cave is flooded with light. The near-nothingness of Schistostega erupts in a shower of sparkles, like green glitter spilled on the rug at Christmas… And then, within minutes, it’s gone. All its needs are met in an ephemeral moment at the end of the day when the sun aligns with the mouth of the cave… Each shoot is shaped like a feather, flat and delicate. The soft blue green fronds stand up like a glad of translucent ferns, tracking the path of the sun. It is so little. And yet it is enough.

    This tiny moss is a master of “the patient gleaming of light” — and what is the greatest feat of the human spirit, the measure of a life well lived, if not a “patient gleaming of light”? Annie Dillard knew this when she wrote: “I cannot cause light; the most I can do is try to put myself in the path of its beam.” And Carl Jung knew it when he insisted that “the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.” The humble, generous Schistostega illuminates the darkness of mere being into blazing awe at the miracle of life itself — a reminder that our existence on this unremarkable rock orbiting an unremarkable star is a glorious cosmic accident, the acute awareness of which calls to mind poet Mark Strand’s memorable words: “It’s such a lucky accident, having been born, that we’re almost obliged to pay attention.”

    To pay attention, indeed, is the ultimate celebration of this accidental miracle of life. Kimmerer captures this with exuberant elegance:

    The combination of circumstances which allows it to exist at all are so implausible that the Schistostega is rendered much more precious than gold. Goblins’ or otherwise. Not only does its presence depend on the coincidence of the cave’s angle to the sun, but if the hills on the western shore were any higher the sun would set before reaching the cave… Its life and ours exist only because of a myriad of synchronicities that bring us to this particular place at this particular moment. In return for such a gift, the only sane response is to glitter in reply.

    Gathering Moss is a glittering read in its entirety. Complement it with Annie Dillard on the art of seeing and the two ways of looking.

    This content was originally published here.

WordPress Ads